Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 20, 2024 at 3:30 pm #42999
andyfrost
ParticipantDespite what you have read on the internet , my early experiences taught me the hard way that acid “CAN” damage very fine threads ,and I managed to ruin a carb , and it wasn’t because of a too rich mixture of acid. I took experienced advice from a good friend and went over to drain cleaner , and have had no problems since.
Andy.
September 20, 2024 at 10:54 am #42996andyfrost
ParticipantIf it’s a carb I’m relatively familiar with , and I know there are no hidden/unknown rubber seals etc., I use a little drain cleaner in the ultrasonic , in your case it would definately work fine , as in a 24T2 there are no hidden “dangers”. A 15min cycle in mine with a little drain cleaner will rid the white corrosion deposits , make sure to drop it into some fresh boiled water , and finish by blowing dry with airline.
Glad you had success with the adjustable jet , it’s the only way to go.Andy.
September 17, 2024 at 8:17 pm #42946andyfrost
ParticipantGeorge Shead at Villiersparts.
Andy.
September 16, 2024 at 8:45 pm #42889andyfrost
ParticipantI use liquid grease(00grease) quite a bit , but it is vitally important to ensure that you have no brass or bronze components in your gearbox if you have you will need the suitable straight grade SAE.
Andy.
September 15, 2024 at 4:40 pm #42878andyfrost
ParticipantCharlie Moore is the man for all things Monrotiller , I’m sure when he gets back from Weeley , he will have the answer for you.
Andy.
September 11, 2024 at 4:36 pm #42851andyfrost
Participant24t2s with fixed jets are ok provided there is very little to no wear in the butterfly shaft , and your engine bore/valve set up is also ok , this is especially so for any application that requires smooth tickover and smooth pickup of revs.
I would always go down the route of changing fixed to adjustable , it eliminates all the USUAL problems with the fixed jet , I had a Coleby a few years back that was a comlete pain until I changed to adjustable.Andy.
September 2, 2024 at 8:20 pm #42842andyfrost
Participant“What surprised me about that engine was the amount of wear on the rings, bushes and big end rollers. Yet the cylinder bore was OK!”
You have to take into account , that extremely few of the machines that come into our hands are all original , many will have had odd bits and pieces fitted to them to keep them running back in their working days.
Soon after the War , my father bought a ModelL brand new , AutoCultos policy then was to have widespread local dealers , who would stock alot of the essential spares. Our dealer was around 8miles away , when cylinder wear started to give poor performance , Father would take the cylinder there , pay a surcharge and walk out with a rebored barrel and new piston , he did this several times in its working life , and it had a HARD life , but it only had one service exhange crank.
This may go some way to explain your possible mismatch of engine bits.Andy.
September 2, 2024 at 11:00 am #42841andyfrost
ParticipantI did think it should have been V111C , as they were the model used by Allen and Simmonds. Should you ever need one I have a new piston (cast iron) for one of those , along with a used , but good cylinder barrel.
I would go along with your views and measurements , but as you say , we’re not dealing with formula one engines.
Many years ago I fully rebuilt a 25A on an AutoCulto model L , the crank rebuild cost a small fotune back then , I dread to think what the cost would be today.Andy.
August 31, 2024 at 3:22 pm #42831andyfrost
ParticipantA couple of things , which model Autoculto do you have that has an V11C engine.
You don’t mention valve guides , often a cause of bad running and burning oil.Andy.
August 31, 2024 at 11:12 am #42821andyfrost
ParticipantMeasure the size of the two pulleys along with centre to centre of shafts , give these measurements to any reputable belt supplier and they should help you out.
Andy.
August 28, 2024 at 8:19 pm #42811andyfrost
ParticipantYes 400 , not the original engine though.
Andy
August 19, 2024 at 2:51 pm #42767andyfrost
ParticipantMillar systems , even when new they produce very weak spark , along with certain types of Villiers. Have you noticed that the newly made coils sold by George or Villiers Services produce a far better spark than the originals , nothing to due with weak magnets or whatever.
And my friend who owns the tester knows more about magnetos than either of us are ever likely to.Andy.
August 17, 2024 at 11:55 am #42758andyfrost
ParticipantWell , I started working on horticultural stuff in the early 1970s , and continued all my life although latterly as a hobbie , and have amassed quite a collection over the years , all of which start , run and perform as they should , and I lay alot of that down to have fully working magnetos , many in the collection have been fully rebuilt , I’m lucky knowing someone who has a PROPER tester.
With regard to your so called 6mm spark test , some ign systems will seldom if ever produce that kind of spark , most notably certain Villiers mags , and Miller systems are notoriously weak. Again there is a vast array of info available , but most of it comes from amateurs with little to no true experience.
I will ask again why do specialists use equipment costing large sums of money , rather than a MM.Andy.
August 16, 2024 at 8:20 pm #42756andyfrost
Participant“Lastly on the thorny and unfortunately contentious matter of multimeters. I would readily agree that specialist magneto repairers have an extensive range of dedicated test equipment that is vastly superior to a multimeter.”
On that I would agree , common sense should tell that IF they could get away with using MMs , why would they purchase equipment costing many more £££££s , the simple answer is they’re not reliable enough.
Andy.
August 16, 2024 at 7:48 pm #42755andyfrost
ParticipantIt is truly amazing what some folk will believe what they read on the internet , sorry but I’ll stick to my experince gained from the university of life.
Andy.
-
AuthorPosts
